Contradiction with Matthew 11:28-30
Contradicts by suggesting the faith requires taking on a different form of yoke and burden, although presented as light, it still implies a burden.
Matthew 11:28-30: Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:1
Contradicts by emphasizing complete freedom in Christ, negating any imposed burden, even if minimal.
Galatians 5:1: Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:23
Contradicts by suggesting that although all things are lawful, not all things are expedient or edifying, potentially conflicting with the idea of placing any burdens at all.
1 Corinthians 10:23: All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. [expedient: or, profitable]
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Contradicts the notion of necessary burdens as it states nothing is unclean in itself, challenging imposed restrictions.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Contradicts by stating that no one should judge in these matters, indirectly opposing any burdens imposed by religious decrees.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or conflict related to Acts 15:28 might revolve around the issue of whether certain Old Testament laws should still apply to Christians. In this context, the chapter discusses which Jewish laws Gentile converts to Christianity need to follow, highlighting differences in the application of Mosaic Law between Jewish and Gentile Christians, which could lead to differing interpretations about the obligation of the law in Christian life.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction in this verse because it implies that certain rules or burdens are necessary for believers, which could conflict with the idea of religious freedom or personal interpretation of faith. It might seem inconsistent with the broader message of grace and individual relationship with God.