Contradiction with Galatians 5:1-2
This verse emphasizes freedom in Christ and warns against taking on the yoke of the law by getting circumcised, which contrasts with the insistence in Acts 15:5 on circumcision according to the law of Moses.
Galatians 5:1-2: Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
Contradiction with Romans 6:14
This verse states that believers are not under the law but under grace, contradicting the requirement of adherence to the law of Moses found in Acts 15:5.
Romans 6:14: For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
These verses explain that the law was a tutor leading to Christ, but now that faith has come, believers are no longer under it, opposing the necessity of the law in Acts 15:5.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Paul argues against being judged by the law regarding food, drink, or festivals, saying these are a shadow of things to come, in contrast to the law adherence promoted in Acts 15:5.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
This verse speaks of the old covenant being obsolete, which challenges the continued enforcement of the law of Moses as desired in Acts 15:5.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Romans 3:20-22
These verses explain that righteousness comes through faith in Jesus Christ, not through the law, which opposes the belief in Acts 15:5 that the law is necessary for belief.
Romans 3:20-22: Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law [is] the knowledge of sin.
Paradox #1
Acts 15:5 might seem to contradict other parts of the New Testament because it involves a debate over whether non-Jewish Christians should follow Jewish law. Some early Christians believed that faith in Jesus alone was enough for salvation, while others thought it was necessary to follow traditional Jewish laws as well. This creates a tension or inconsistency with teachings that emphasize faith over law for salvation.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction between Acts 15:5, where certain believers argue that Gentile converts must follow Jewish laws, and other parts of the New Testament that emphasize salvation through faith in Jesus, not through following the law. This could be seen as inconsistent because it raises questions about whether Christians must adhere to Jewish customs in addition to believing in Jesus for salvation.
Paradox #3
Acts 15:5 discusses the debate among early Christians about whether non-Jewish converts to Christianity should follow Jewish laws. The contradiction or conflict here involves differing opinions within the early Christian community: some believed that adherence to Jewish customs, like circumcision, was necessary, while others believed that faith in Jesus was enough for salvation. This reflects a historical tension between maintaining Jewish traditions and embracing a new, more inclusive faith.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Acts 15:5 arises from the tension between the early Christians' need to follow Jewish law and their belief in freedom through faith in Jesus. Some believed that new followers still had to obey traditional laws, while others thought that faith alone was enough. This creates a conflict between maintaining old religious customs and embracing a new, faith-based path without those strict rules.