Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Emphasizes living peaceably with all men, which contrasts with the accusation of causing trouble in Acts 16:20.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Calls for peacemakers to be blessed, opposing the idea of disturbance in Acts 16:20.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Hebrews 12:14
Urges followers to pursue peace with all, unlike the allegation of troubling the city.
Hebrews 12:14: Follow peace with all [men], and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:13
Encourages being at peace among yourselves, contrary to causing uproar in Acts 16:20.
1 Thessalonians 5:13: And to esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake. [And] be at peace among yourselves.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:11
Advises to seek peace and ensue it, in opposition to allegations of unrest.
1 Peter 3:11: Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue it.
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 13:11
Calls for living in peace, contrasting the charge of disturbance.
2 Corinthians 13:11: Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace; and the God of love and peace shall be with you.
Contradiction with James 3:17
Describes wisdom from above as peaceable, conflicting with claims of causing trouble.
James 3:17: But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, [and] easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. [partiality: or, wrangling]
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:20
States that counselors of peace have joy, opposite to the disruption mentioned in Acts 16:20.
Proverbs 12:20: Deceit [is] in the heart of them that imagine evil: but to the counsellors of peace [is] joy.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency might arise from the treatment of individuals based on their cultural or religious background. The verse can be seen as highlighting a conflict between the local customs or laws and the message that Paul and Silas were spreading. This could point to the tension between maintaining social order and the introduction of new ideas or beliefs that challenge existing norms. Additionally, it reflects on how different groups might clash due to differing values or priorities.