Contradiction with Proverbs 26:4
This verse advises not to answer a fool according to his folly, which contradicts Acts 18:15's context of dealing with disputes, suggesting engagement may sometimes be necessary.
Proverbs 26:4: Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse advises against judging others, which could contradict the notion of making a judgment found in Acts 18:15.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:1
This verse discourages believers from seeking judgment in secular courts, contrasting with the judgement handling context in Acts 18:15.
1 Corinthians 6:1: Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?
Contradiction with James 4:11
This verse advises against speaking evil of one another and judging, which can conflict with making judgments or dismissing cases as seen in Acts 18:15.
James 4:11: Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of [his] brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge.
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
This verse highlights that passing judgment shows hypocrisy, contradicting Acts 18:15's suggestion of resolving matters.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Paradox #1
Acts 18:15 could present a contradiction if one interprets it as avoiding responsibility in judging disputes about beliefs, while other parts of religious texts or teachings often encourage engagement and guidance in matters of faith and morality. This can lead to confusion about when to intervene or mediate in religious conflicts.