Contradictions and Paradoxes in Acts 1:18

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Acts 1:18 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Acts 1:18. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Luke, the person who did something wrong used the money he got to buy a field, but when he fell down, his body broke open. This story shows that bad choices can have really sad endings.

Acts 1:18: Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.

Contradiction with Matthew 27:5

Matthew 27:5 states that Judas threw down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed and went and hanged himself, contrasting Acts 1:18, which describes Judas falling headlong and bursting open.

Matthew 27:5: And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.

Contradiction with Acts 1:25

This verse mentions Judas going to his own place, suggesting a different perspective on his fate than the graphic description in Acts 1:18.

Acts 1:25: That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.

Paradox #1

Acts 1:18 might seem to contradict Matthew 27:5 regarding the details of Judas Iscariot's death. Acts describes Judas falling in a field and dying, while Matthew says he hanged himself. This discrepancy can lead to confusion about how exactly Judas died.

Paradox #2

The potential contradiction with Acts 1:18 lies in its account of Judas Iscariot's death, which differs from the description found in Matthew 27:5. Acts describes Judas dying from a fall, while Matthew mentions him hanging himself. This has led to discussions about how these two accounts reconcile with each other.

Paradox #3

The contradiction arises when comparing "Acts 1:18" with "Matthew 27:5". In "Acts," it states that Judas bought a field and died from a fall, but "Matthew" mentions Judas hanged himself after returning the money used to buy the field. The inconsistencies lie in the manner of Judas's death and what was done with the money.

Paradox #4

The potential contradiction with Acts 1:18 lies in its account of Judas Iscariot's death compared to the description in Matthew 27:5. Acts 1:18 suggests a specific manner of death for Judas, while Matthew 27:5 describes it differently. This difference in accounts can be seen as a historical or narrative inconsistency.

Paradox #5

One possible contradiction is that Acts 1:18 describes how Judas met his end in a way that's different from the account in Matthew 27:5. This could lead to questions about consistency in the description of his death between the two accounts.

Paradox #6

Acts 1:18 describes the death of Judas in a way that differs from the account in Matthew 27:5. In Acts, it says Judas died by falling in a field, whereas Matthew states he hanged himself. This creates a contradiction in the description of how Judas died.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.