Contradictions and Paradoxes in Acts 21:14

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Acts 21:14 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Acts 21:14. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Luke, this verse shows that people stopped trying to change Paul's mind because they believed that what was happening was God's plan. They trusted that God knew what was best, even if they didn't understand it.

Acts 21:14: And when he would not be persuaded, we ceased, saying, The will of the Lord be done.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:39

Acts 21:14 encourages acceptance of God's will without resistance, while Matthew 5:39 suggests not resisting the evil, implying different contexts for acceptance and resistance.

Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

Contradiction with John 7:30

Acts 21:14 shows acceptance of God's will, while John 7:30 shows an attempt to harm Jesus, yet His time had not yet come, suggesting a contrast between divine timing and human action.

John 7:30: Then they sought to take him: but no man laid hands on him, because his hour was not yet come.

Contradiction with 1 Samuel 15:22

Acts 21:14 accepts the Lord's will as ultimate, while 1 Samuel 15:22 points out that obedience is more critical than sacrifice, emphasizing a nuanced understanding of God's will.

1 Samuel 15:22: And Samuel said, Hath the LORD [as great] delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey [is] better than sacrifice, [and] to hearken than the fat of rams.

Contradiction with Genesis 22:2-3

Acts 21:14 involves passive acceptance, while Genesis 22:2-3 involves active obedience to God's command, showing different responses to divine will.

Genesis 22:2-3: And he said, Take now thy son, thine only [son] Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

Contradiction with Jonah 1:3

Acts 21:14 speaks of submission to God's will, in contrast, Jonah 1:3 shows a refusal to follow God's directive, highlighting human defiance.

Jonah 1:3: But Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarshish from the presence of the LORD, and went down to Joppa; and he found a ship going to Tarshish: so he paid the fare thereof, and went down into it, to go with them unto Tarshish from the presence of the LORD.

Contradiction with Exodus 5:2

Acts 21:14 regards submission to divine will, whereas Exodus 5:2 reflects Pharaoh’s defiance against God's command, illustrating opposition to divine authority.

Exodus 5:2: And Pharaoh said, Who [is] the LORD, that I should obey his voice to let Israel go? I know not the LORD, neither will I let Israel go.

Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9

Acts 21:14 emphasizes surrendering to the divine plan, while Proverbs 16:9 suggests that humans plan their ways but God directs their steps, presenting a contrast between human intent and divine control.

Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.