Contradiction with Acts 10:28
Acts 10:28 highlights Peter's acceptance of Gentiles, contradicting the claim in Acts 21:28 of defiling the temple by bringing Greeks in.
Acts 10:28: And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Galatians 3:28 emphasizes the unity of all in Christ, contradicting the notion of excluding non-Jews as suggested in Acts 21:28.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 10:12
Romans 10:12 states there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, opposing the exclusionary perspective in Acts 21:28.
Romans 10:12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14
Ephesians 2:14 speaks of Christ breaking down the barrier between Jews and Gentiles, contradicting the separation implied in Acts 21:28.
Ephesians 2:14: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with John 4:9
John 4:9 reflects Jewish disdain for association with Samaritans, highlighting a cultural contradiction to the accusation in Acts 21:28 regarding Greeks.
John 4:9: Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction or conflict with Acts 21:28 could lie in the tension between Jewish law and the message of inclusivity in Christianity. The verse mentions accusations against Paul for teaching against Jewish customs and bringing Gentiles into the temple. This could conflict with earlier teachings in the New Testament that suggest the old laws were being fulfilled or transformed, leading to debates about whether Jewish customs should still be followed by Christians. Different interpretations of the role of Jewish law can cause inconsistencies in understanding how it's applied within Christianity.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Acts 21:28 could be related to the accusation that Paul brought Gentiles into the temple, which is historically debated. The temple had strict rules about who could enter certain areas, and it's uncertain if there were concrete evidence of Paul's actions as described, leading to potential inconsistency in the account.
Paradox #3
Acts 21:28 involves an accusation against Paul for allegedly bringing Gentiles into the temple, violating Jewish law. The contradiction could be seen in the conflict between adhering to traditional religious laws and the new teachings of inclusivity and acceptance in Christianity. This highlights the tension between old customs and new beliefs.