Contradiction with Acts 9:7
Acts 9:7 states that the men who were with Saul heard a voice, whereas Acts 22:9 claims they did not hear the voice that spoke to Saul.
Acts 9:7: And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.
Paradox #1
The story in Acts 22:9 seems to conflict with a similar account in Acts 9:7 regarding whether the people with Paul heard the voice or not. One passage implies they did hear it, but another says they didn't understand it. This creates a bit of confusion about what the companions experienced during Paul's conversion.
Paradox #2
Acts 22:9 seems to contradict an earlier account in Acts 9:7. In Acts 9:7, it is described that the men with Paul heard a voice during the event on the road to Damascus, whereas in Acts 22:9, it says they did not hear the voice. This creates an apparent inconsistency about what the companions experienced during the event.
Paradox #3
The contradiction often pointed out regarding Acts 22:9 is related to its account of Paul’s conversion experience compared to another account in Acts 9:7. In Acts 22:9, it is mentioned that Paul's companions did not hear the voice speaking to him, whereas in Acts 9:7, it states that they heard the sound. This discrepancy raises discussions on whether they heard the voice or not.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or inconsistency could be seen in the differing accounts of the same event: in one version, others hear a voice, while in another, they don't understand it. This might challenge the idea of exact truthfulness or reliability in the narrative.