Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises to turn the other cheek when wronged, contradicting the retaliation implied in Acts 23:3.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
This verse exhorts not to repay evil for evil, opposing the sentiment of rebuke in Acts 23:3.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
This verse instructs not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult, which contrasts with Paul's reaction in Acts 23:3.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
This verse suggests a soft answer turns away wrath, which differs from the harsh response in Acts 23:3.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with James 1:19-20
These verses encourage being slow to speak and slow to anger, contrasting with the immediate indignation expressed in Acts 23:3.
James 1:19-20: Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
Paradox #1
The verse in question has Paul confronting the high priest Ananias for ordering him to be struck, calling him a "whitewashed wall" and accusing him of violating the law. The potential contradiction lies in the Bible's teachings on respecting authority. While Romans 13:1-2 encourages believers to obey governing authorities, Paul openly rebukes a religious leader here. This could be seen as conflicting advice on how to respond to authorities who act unjustly.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict related to Acts 23:3 involves Apostle Paul's criticism directed at the high priest Ananias. The inconsistency lies in Paul's reaction because, later in the context, Paul says he did not know Ananias was the high priest. Some find it puzzling that Paul, who was familiar with Jewish customs and leadership, did not recognize the high priest during this significant meeting, raising questions about the consistency of the narrative.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Acts 23:3 may arise from the issue of hypocrisy. In the verse, Paul points out that someone is accusing him of breaking the law while they themselves are also violating the law. This situation highlights how people can sometimes condemn others for actions that they themselves are guilty of, which presents a conflict between what is preached and what is practiced.