Contradiction with Acts 10:34
Acts 23:34 involves a legal setting emphasizing jurisdiction, whereas Acts 10:34 states God is no respecter of persons, implying impartiality, which contrasts with human legal processes.
Acts 10:34: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with James 2:9
Acts 23:34 discusses jurisdiction related to Roman governance, while James 2:9 warns against showing favoritism, which contradicts the human legal systems that may involve partiality.
James 2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Contradiction with Romans 2:11
Acts 23:34 pertains to specific Roman legal jurisdiction, which can involve human bias, whereas Romans 2:11 states that there is no partiality with God, emphasizing divine impartiality.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 1:17
Acts 23:34 concerns earthly jurisdiction being determined, contrasting with 1 Peter 1:17, where God judges impartially according to one's works.
1 Peter 1:17: And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning [here] in fear:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Acts 23:34 discusses the determination of jurisdiction, emphasizing Roman distinction of authority, while Galatians 3:28 speaks of unity in Christ, eliminating distinctions.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.