Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Acts 23:5 implies respect and lack of criticism towards authority, while Matthew 5:44 calls for loving and praying for enemies even when criticized.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 13:1
Acts 23:5 suggests immediate respect for rulers, while Romans 13:1 emphasizes subjection to governing authorities as established by God, suggesting a more overarching divine mandate.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with 1 Peter 2:17
Acts 23:5 indicates regret for speaking against a ruler, whereas 1 Peter 2:17 gives a directive to honor all people and specifically to honor the king, prescribing broader respect.
1 Peter 2:17: Honour all [men]. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king. [Honour all: or, Esteem all]
Contradiction with Titus 3:1
Acts 23:5 deals with personal behavior after the fact, while Titus 3:1 instructs believers to be submissive to authorities proactively.
Titus 3:1: Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:21
Acts 23:5 is a response to a specific situation, whereas Proverbs 24:21 advises an ongoing fear and respect for both God and the king.
Proverbs 24:21: My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: [and] meddle not with them that are given to change: [them...: Heb. changers]
Paradox #1
One possible theological conflict with Acts 23:5 is that it seems to contradict other instances where figures in the Bible, including Paul himself, knowingly challenge or disrespect religious leaders or authorities, suggesting a lack of consistency in how religious leaders are treated or spoken about in different contexts.
Paradox #2
Acts 23:5 has a potential historical inconsistency because Paul claims he did not know Ananias was the high priest. Some might find this puzzling since high priests were prominent figures, and Paul, being knowledgeable in Jewish law and customs, would likely recognize such an important leader. However, explanations might suggest Paul was either speaking sarcastically or genuinely did not recognize him due to poor visibility or other circumstances during the hearing.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Acts 23:5 could lie in the idea of respecting authority figures while acknowledging their wrongdoing. The verse suggests a need to respect leaders, but this can conflict with situations where those leaders act unjustly. This raises questions about when it's appropriate to show respect and when to oppose wrongdoing, creating a tension between obedience and justice.