Contradiction with Jeremiah 19:5
This verse speaks of acts not commanded by God, suggesting that some deeds are contrary to His plan.
Jeremiah 19:5: They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire [for] burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake [it], neither came [it] into my mind:
Contradiction with James 1:13
This verse indicates that God does not tempt anyone to do evil, which contradicts the idea of a predetermined plan involving wicked acts.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
This emphasizes God's desire for repentance rather than predetermined death or destruction.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
This verse expresses God's wish for all to be saved, contrasting the idea of a predetermined act leading to crucifixion.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse suggests that God is patient and not wanting anyone to perish, implying a preference for free will over predetermined actions leading to sin.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Paradox #1
Acts 2:23 might present a contradiction or conflict related to the concepts of divine foreknowledge and human free will. The verse suggests that Jesus' death was both part of God's predetermined plan and carried out by human actions. This can lead to questions about how God's control and human freedom can both operate in the context of events. If God had already planned the event, it raises the question of whether the people involved truly had a choice in their actions, potentially challenging the idea of human responsibility and free will.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction in this verse because it talks about God's plan and human actions. It suggests that Jesus' death was part of God's plan, but at the same time, it says people were responsible for his crucifixion. This can seem inconsistent because it raises questions about how God's control and human free will can both be true at the same time.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction or conflict with Acts 2:23 could be the tension between divine foreknowledge and human free will. Some might question how God's predetermined plan can coexist with individuals freely making choices. This raises debates about whether human actions are truly free if they fulfill a divine purpose.
Paradox #4
Acts 2:23 presents a potential contradiction or conflict between divine foreknowledge and human free will. It suggests that certain events were part of God's predetermined plan, but these events involved human actions that were morally wrong. This raises questions about the compatibility of God's plan with human responsibility and accountability for those actions.