Contradiction with Matthew 15:24
States Jesus was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel, while Acts 2:39 extends the promise to all who are afar off.
Matthew 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with Matthew 10:5-6
Instructs to avoid Gentiles and Samaritans, contradicting the universality suggested in Acts 2:39.
Matthew 10:5-6: These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into [any] city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
Contradiction with Romans 9:27
Indicates only a remnant of Israel will be saved, conflicting with the inclusive promise in Acts 2:39.
Romans 9:27: Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:
Contradiction with Matthew 22:14
Suggests many are called but few are chosen, contrasting the open promise found in Acts 2:39.
Matthew 22:14: Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in [his] talk.
Contradiction with John 12:40
Speaks of people being blinded and unable to turn and be healed, contradicting the call to all in Acts 2:39.
John 12:40: He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with [their] eyes, nor understand with [their] heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Acts 2:39 could be the idea of exclusivity or inclusivity in terms of religious promises or salvation. Some might argue there is an inconsistency if promises are seen as restricted to certain groups or individuals, conflicting with the teaching of universal love and acceptance. Others might see it as universally inclusive, aligning with the idea that God's message is for everyone. This can lead to differing interpretations of who is included or excluded.