Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Matthew 5:39 suggests turning the other cheek when wronged, contrasting with the act of pushing away a fellow in defiance described in Acts 7:27.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
Proverbs 15:1 advises a soft answer to turn away wrath, in opposition to the act of pushing described in Acts 7:27.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Romans 12:17 instructs believers not to repay anyone evil for evil, which contrasts with the defiant reaction in Acts 7:27.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:29
Luke 6:29 preaches offering the other cheek instead of retaliating, which is contradictory to the behavior shown in Acts 7:27.
Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Romans 12:18 counsels living peaceably with all, unlike the confrontational behavior seen in Acts 7:27.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in Acts 7:27 could be seen in the idea of rejecting someone who is trying to help or correct wrongdoing. A person who resists advice or help might struggle with pride or unwillingness to change, leading to potential conflict between the need for personal accountability and the resistance to outside guidance.