Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Amos 1:9 condemns Tyre for not remembering brotherly covenant; Matthew 5:44 encourages love and forgiveness to enemies, suggesting reconciliation instead of punishment.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:14
Amos 1:9 speaks of punishment for betrayal, whereas Romans 12:14 advises blessing those who persecute you, advocating forbearance rather than judgment.
Romans 12:14: Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:32
Amos 1:9 implies a consequence for broken covenants, while Ephesians 4:32 calls for kindness and forgiveness, highlighting restoration over retribution.
Ephesians 4:32: And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Amos 1:9 focuses on justice against treachery, yet Luke 6:27 urges loving your enemies, presenting a notion of mercy contrary to the pronounced judgment.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21
The punishment in Amos 1:9 is in contrast to Proverbs 25:21, which suggests feeding a hungry enemy, promoting acts of kindness instead of retribution.
Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Luke 17:3-4
Amos 1:9 doesn’t mention forgiveness, whereas Luke 17:3-4 emphasizes forgiveness if a brother repents, illustrating a path to forgiveness and reconciliation.
Luke 17:3-4: Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency could be perceived in the idea of punishment being enacted upon a nation for past wrongs, potentially affecting individuals who were not directly responsible for those actions. This brings up questions about collective punishment and justice. However, interpretations can vary widely, and understanding the historical and cultural context is important.