Contradiction with Amos 5:24
Amos 2:7 criticizes social injustice, while Amos 5:24 calls for justice to roll down as waters, suggesting a need for justice rather than criticism.
Amos 5:24: But let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream. [run: Heb. roll]
Contradiction with Proverbs 14:31
Amos 2:7 condemns the oppression of the poor, while Proverbs 14:31 states that one honors God by being kind to the needy, implying kindness instead of oppression.
Proverbs 14:31: He that oppresseth the poor reproacheth his Maker: but he that honoureth him hath mercy on the poor.
Contradiction with James 2:6-7
Amos 2:7 speaks against oppression, whereas James 2:6-7 discusses the dishonor of the poor by the rich, which contrasts with the call to not exploit or oppress.
James 2:6-7: But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats?
Contradiction with Matthew 5:7
Amos 2:7 deals with the unjust treatment of the vulnerable, whereas Matthew 5:7 highlights the virtue of mercy, advocating for merciful behavior.
Matthew 5:7: Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:17
Amos 2:7 highlights wrongful actions against the poor, while Isaiah 1:17 calls to seek justice and correct oppression, which opposes the issues highlighted in Amos 2:7.
Isaiah 1:17: Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow. [relieve: or, righten]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the cultural and historical practices of the time, which may seem unjust or oppressive by today's standards. The actions described may involve exploitation or mistreatment of vulnerable individuals, leading to questions about fairness and morality. If judging by today’s ethical standards, these actions could be viewed as inconsistent with the broader biblical themes of justice and compassion.