Contradiction with Isaiah 40:1-2
While Amos 5:2 speaks of the fall with no one to lift up Israel, Isaiah 40:1-2 provides comfort and speaks of pardoning iniquity.
Isaiah 40:1-2: Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 31:3-4
Amos 5:2 indicates Israel's fall, whereas Jeremiah speaks of God's everlasting love and His intent to build Israel up again.
Jeremiah 31:3-4: The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, [saying], Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee. [of...: Heb. from afar] [with lovingkindness...: have I extended lovingkindness unto thee]
Contradiction with Hosea 1:10
Amos 5:2 highlights the fallen state, in contrast, Hosea speaks of a future where Israel's numbers will be as the sand of the sea.
Hosea 1:10: Yet the number of the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be measured nor numbered; and it shall come to pass, [that] in the place where it was said unto them, Ye [are] not my people, [there] it shall be said unto them, [Ye are] the sons of the living God. [in...: or, instead of that]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 37:11-14
Amos 5:2 mentions the virgin of Israel fallen, while Ezekiel speaks of the restoration of Israel.
Ezekiel 37:11-14: Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.
Contradiction with Zephaniah 3:14-17
Amos 5:2 discusses the downfall, yet Zephaniah highlights joy and the Lord's presence among His people.
Zephaniah 3:14-17: Sing, O daughter of Zion; shout, O Israel; be glad and rejoice with all the heart, O daughter of Jerusalem.
Paradox #1
The potential conflict in Amos 5:2 could arise from the image of a loving and just God allowing the downfall of the people. This might seem inconsistent with the expectation that a compassionate deity would always protect and save. The moral tension here is between justice and mercy.