Can Kings Ignore Divine Warnings? Exploring Biblical Contradictions

In this article, you will learn how Deuteronomy 17:17 contradicts 1 Kings 11:3 and 2 Samuel 5:13. Find the translations at the bottom of the page..

In the mosaic passage of Deuteronomy 17:17, Moses communicates a striking piece of divine wisdom regarding the responsibilities and limitations of a king. It advises, “Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.” This guidance emphasizes the importance of restraint and the dangers of excess, suggesting that indulgence in wealth and relationships might lead a king away from righteous actions and devotion to God.

However, as the biblical narrative unfolds, prominent figures such as Solomon and David appear to diverge significantly from this instruction. For example, in 1 Kings 11:3, Solomon is described as having "seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines." Despite his renowned wisdom, Solomon’s accumulations highlight a stark contrast to the counsel provided in Deuteronomy. Similarly, 2 Samuel 5:13 records David taking “more concubines and wives out of Jerusalem,” once again reflecting actions that seem at odds with the careful guidance intended to keep a king's focus on righteous leadership.

These apparent contradictions raise intriguing questions about the nature of divine instructions and human choices. Like a parent advising a child not to eat too much candy to prevent illness, God’s instruction to kings aims to safeguard them from the perils of excess. Yet, the stories of Solomon and David resemble a child who, despite knowing better, consumes the candy and faces the consequences later.

Such discrepancies invite reflection on the broader implications of disregarding wisdom, even that presumed to be divinely inspired. Do these narratives caution against losing sight of spiritual and moral obligations amidst worldly pursuits? Are they reminders that even the wisest or most revered individuals can falter by ignoring foundational principles?