Are We Really Allowed to Eat Everything?

In this article, you will learn how Genesis 9:3 contradicts Genesis 1:29, Leviticus 11:2-47, Deuteronomy 14:3-21, Isaiah 11:6-9 and Romans 14:21. Find the translations at the bottom of the page..

The Bible offers diverse perspectives on dietary habits, which can appear contradictory when examined closely. At the heart of this discussion is Genesis 9:3, where God tells Noah that every moving thing is given for food, similar to how plants are provided for sustenance. This seems to encourage a broad diet, including both plants and animals.

However, stepping back to Genesis 1:29, an initial framework is laid out, where God prescribes a plant-based diet consisting of seed-bearing plants and fruits. This foundational instruction appears to contrast with the later, more inclusive diet. Think of it as starting a new job where initially, you're told to wear formal attire, but later, casual wear becomes acceptable—creating confusion about the dress code.

Compounding this complexity are the dietary laws in Leviticus 11:2-47 and Deuteronomy 14:3-21, which meticulously outline clean and unclean foods, indicating restrictions on what is permissible to eat. This meticulous guidance sharply contradicts the sweeping permission in Genesis 9:3.

Adding another layer is Isaiah 11:6-9, which envisions a harmonious world devoid of violence, including the killing of animals. This prophetic vision subtly challenges the unrestricted consumption of animals, aligning instead with a peaceful coexistence. Imagine a utopian society where all beings live in harmony; would dietary practices then change to reflect this peace?

In the New Testament, Romans 14:21 suggests considerations for others in dietary choices, advising against eating meat if it causes another to stumble. This advice seems to enforce a mindful approach, contrasting with the freedom suggested in Genesis 9:3.

Together, these verses weave a complex tapestry of dietary guidance, with each thread pulling in a different direction. The question then arises: How do we interpret these diverse teachings in a way that aligns with our values and context?