A Paradox of Justice: Retaliation or Forgiveness?

In this article, you will learn how Leviticus 24:20 contradicts Matthew 5:38-39, Romans 12:17, 1 Peter 3:9, Proverbs 20:22 and 1 Thessalonians 5:15. Find the translations at the bottom of the page..

Throughout religious teachings, there's a notable contradiction in the approach to justice and retribution. One prominent example comes from the teachings of Moses in Leviticus, specifically Leviticus 24:20. This verse advocates the principle of "an eye for an eye," suggesting that if someone injures another, they should be injured in kind. At first glance, it appears to promote fairness by ensuring that the punishment fits the crime.

However, as we delve deeper into other biblical teachings, a different message begins to unfold. In Matthew 5:38-39, we find an intriguing shift with Jesus teaching to "resist not evil" and advising to "turn the other cheek." This advocates for forgiveness and mercy rather than the cycle of retaliation suggested in Leviticus, steering believers towards a path of compassion over strict justice.

Similarly, in Romans 12:17, the advice is to "recompense to no man evil for evil." This further emphasizes the worth of non-retaliation, encouraging individuals to forsake the cycle of revenge. In 1 Peter 3:9, believers are urged to not render "evil for evil," instead blessing others, which turns the notion of retributive justice on its head.

This contradiction is also highlighted in proverbs such as Proverbs 20:22, which advises against saying, "I will recompense evil," promoting patience and faith in divine justice rather than personal vengeance. Lastly, 1 Thessalonians 5:15 underscores the importance of ensuring "that none render evil for evil," advocating for pursuing good in actions towards all.

Imagine two paths diverging from a single point: one represents the immediate and direct response of "an eye for an eye," and the other, a more forgiving and patient approach. This tension between justice as retribution and justice as forgiveness invites reflection on not just what justice means, but how it should be enacted in daily life. How does one choose which path to follow? This contradiction offers much to ponder in the journey of faith and morality.