Exploring the Generational Contradictions: Did Er Have a Legacy?

In this article, you will learn how Numbers 26:19 contradicts Genesis 38:7, Genesis 46:12 and 1 Chronicles 2:3. Find the translations at the bottom of the page..

In the complex tapestry of biblical narrative, certain passages present intriguing contradictions that invite deeper reflection. Such is the case with the story of Er, one of Judah’s sons. In Numbers 26:19, Er and Onan are mentioned as sons of Judah, with the note that they died in the land of Canaan due to their wrongdoings. This passage seems straightforward, emphasizing the theme that poor choices can lead to severe consequences. However, when we examine other scripture references concerning Er, the narrative takes an unexpected turn.

In Genesis 38:7, Er is described as wicked in the eyes of the Lord, prompting God to put him to death. Here, there is no mention of Er having a future or legacy—only that his life was cut short due to his wickedness. Similarly, in Genesis 46:12, during the listing of Jacob's descendants who went to Egypt, Er is included but noted as deceased, adding to the notion that his lineage did not continue. This seems at odds with the genealogical tone suggested in Numbers 26:19, where descendants and heritage are often focal points.

Further complicating the narrative, 1 Chronicles 2:3 echoes Genesis, reinforcing that Er was deemed evil and died accordingly. These additional passages raise questions about whether Er could have possibly had a lineage, as typically suggested when descendants are discussed.

This contradiction is akin to a missing branch on a family tree that some claim exists, yet when you trace the lines, none seems to lead back to a particular individual. Was Er's story meant to be a cautionary tale devoid of legacy, as the Chronicles suggest, or is there a hidden lineage yet to be uncovered in scripture? These inconsistencies invite us to ponder and explore the depths of divine justice and its portrayal across different texts.