Contradiction with Acts 13:39
This verse states that believers are justified from all things by Jesus, which contrasts with the idea of requiring the law ordinances for justification, seemingly conflicting with the notion of removing such requirements as indicated in Colossians 2:14.
Acts 13:39: And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
This verse mentions that Jesus came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it, which could contradict Colossians 2:14 if interpreted as abolishing the law.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
This verse suggests that faith does not nullify the law but rather establishes it, which might be viewed as contrary to the notion of the law being blotted out in Colossians 2:14.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:1-2
These verses indicate the law is a shadow of good things to come and is not completely obsolete, which may contradict the idea of removing the law entirely as suggested in Colossians 2:14.
Hebrews 10:1-2: For the law having a shadow of good things to come, [and] not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect.
Paradox #1
Some people see a conflict between this verse and the idea that the Old Testament laws are still fully applicable. This verse suggests that certain legal requirements were set aside or resolved, which can seem inconsistent with the belief that all Old Testament laws should still be followed.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Colossians 2:14 might arise from the idea of punishment and justice. The verse implies that everyone's wrongdoings are forgiven and set aside because of a single act. Some people may see this as conflicting with the idea of taking responsibility for one's own actions and consequences. It raises questions about fairness and justice when it comes to addressing wrong behavior.