Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
This verse suggests a soft answer can turn away wrath, potentially contradicting the directive to put away all wrath mentioned in Colossians 3:8 by suggesting it can be useful in conflict resolution.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:26
This verse allows for anger without sin, contradicting the absolute prohibition of anger in Colossians 3:8.
Ephesians 4:26: Be ye angry, and sin not: let not the sun go down upon your wrath:
Contradiction with Matthew 5:22
This verse speaks against anger towards a brother, which can be seen as a contradiction to Colossians 3:8's prohibition when considering contexts where anger might be justified.
Matthew 5:22: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. [Raca: that is, Vain fellow]
Contradiction with Psalm 4:4
Suggests that one can be angry but should not sin, contradicting the full renouncement of anger as advocated in Colossians 3:8.
Psalm 4:4: Stand in awe, and sin not: commune with your own heart upon your bed, and be still. Selah.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Colossians 3:8 may arise when it is interpreted in different contexts. The verse advises against anger, rage, and slander, which seem universally good. However, some might see conflict if they believe that these emotions are sometimes necessary to fight injustice or advocate passionately for important causes. The contradiction lies in balancing the suppression of negative emotions with the need to act against wrongs.