Contradiction with Isaiah 53:2
Describes the coming servant (often associated with the Messiah) as having no form nor beauty, contrasting with Daniel 10:6 which describes a figure with a dazzling appearance.
Isaiah 53:2: For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, [there is] no beauty that we should desire him.
Contradiction with Matthew 17:2
Describes Jesus' transfiguration with a radiant face and clothes, while Daniel 10:6 emphasizes a particular figure's unique physical descriptors, noting both events present figures with radiant appearances but in different contexts.
Matthew 17:2: And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.
Contradiction with Mark 9:3
Discusses Jesus’ clothing becoming exceedingly white during the transfiguration, highlighting a similar radiant transformation in appearance as in Daniel 10:6 but not aligning fully in description.
Mark 9:3: And his raiment became shining, exceeding white as snow; so as no fuller on earth can white them.
Contradiction with Revelation 1:14-15
Provides a description of Christ with eyes like a flame of fire and feet like fine brass, similar yet distinct in its particular details from Daniel 10:6, demonstrating John's vision with subtle differences.
Revelation 1:14-15: His head and [his] hairs [were] white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes [were] as a flame of fire;
Contradiction with Philippians 2:7
Contrasts the figure in Daniel 10:6 by describing Christ taking the form of a servant and being humble, rather than the majestic and commanding appearance of Daniel’s vision.
Philippians 2:7: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: