Contradiction with Proverbs 21:31
The verse states, "The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD," emphasizing reliance on God for victory rather than human strength or strategy, contrasting with Daniel 11:25's focus on human strength and courage in battle.
Proverbs 21:31: The horse [is] prepared against the day of battle: but safety [is] of the LORD. [safety: or, victory]
Contradiction with Psalm 33:16
"There is no king saved by the multitude of an host: a mighty man is not delivered by much strength," suggests that reliance on large armies and human strength is not what leads to victory, opposing the emphasis on a powerful army in Daniel 11:25.
Psalm 33:16: There is no king saved by the multitude of an host: a mighty man is not delivered by much strength.
Contradiction with Isaiah 31:1
This verse advises against relying on human strength and military might, advising to trust in God, contradicting Daniel 11:25's emphasis on human military strength and courage.
Isaiah 31:1: Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because [they are] many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the LORD!
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Jesus says, "for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword," suggesting a spiritual and moral stance against reliance on military force, contrasting the militaristic focus in Daniel 11:25.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency related to Daniel 11:25 might involve difficulties in matching the details of the events described with specific historical figures or events. Some scholars find challenges in aligning the prophecy with known historical records of the conflicts between the kings of the North and the South, especially concerning the timeline and the identities of these kings. However, interpretations can vary widely, leading to debates among historians and theologians.