Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
Daniel 11:27 suggests a specific outcome from their plans, whereas Proverbs 19:21 states that the counsel of the Lord is what ultimately prevails.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Contradiction with James 4:13-15
Daniel 11:27 implies certainty in the kings' plans to deceive, while James 4:13-15 reminds that only God can determine future events.
James 4:13-15: Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain:
Contradiction with Isaiah 46:10
Daniel 11:27 depicts human schemes, whereas Isaiah 46:10 declares that God's purpose will stand, implying human plans can be futile.
Isaiah 46:10: Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
Contradiction with Psalm 33:10-11
Daniel 11:27 shows the kings' plans, but Psalm 33:10-11 emphasizes that the Lord brings the counsel of nations to nothing.
Psalm 33:10-11: The LORD bringeth the counsel of the heathen to nought: he maketh the devices of the people of none effect. [bringeth: Heb. maketh frustrate]
Contradiction with Job 5:12-13
Daniel 11:27 indicates the kings' intentions to act wisely through deceit, whereas Job 5:12-13 states that God frustrates the plans of the crafty.
Job 5:12-13: He disappointeth the devices of the crafty, so that their hands cannot perform [their] enterprise. [their enterprise: or, any thing]
Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
Daniel 11:27 describes their hearts planning evil, whereas Proverbs 16:9 teaches that it is the Lord who establishes one's steps.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in Daniel 11:27 could arise from interpreting the actions and motivations of the two kings discussed in the verse. Some might perceive a contradiction between these kings' intentions and outcomes versus common expectations for leaders' behavior, such as honesty and loyalty. It could challenge readers’ understanding of divine justice and prophecy fulfillment, if viewed in isolation from the broader biblical narrative.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict in Daniel 11:27 may arise due to the difficulty in aligning the events described in the verse with specific historical figures or events, as the accounts can be seen as either symbolic or not matching recorded history exactly. Different interpretations lead to debates about whether the prophecy accurately foretells historical events or if it reflects a more theological narrative.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in this verse could be seen as discussing deceit between parties that are supposed to be working together. This might seem inconsistent with teachings of honesty and integrity.