Daniel 11:31 Contradictions and Paradoxes

According to Daniel, this verse talks about a bad time when enemies come and do bad things in God's special place, stopping the usual prayers and putting something terrible there. Christians often see this as a warning about staying faithful even when things are tough.

Contradiction with Exodus 20:3

Daniel 11:31 describes the setting up of an abomination in the temple, while Exodus 20:3 commands not to have other gods, implying a strict monotheism.

Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:17

Daniel 11:31 suggests a desecration, whereas Matthew 5:17 emphasizes Jesus' role to fulfill, not abolish the law and prophets.

Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.

Contradiction with John 4:24

Daniel 11:31 involves physical desecration, while John 4:24 speaks of true worship being in spirit and truth, without physical constraints.

John 4:24: God [is] a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship [him] in spirit and in truth.

Contradiction with Romans 12:21

Daniel 11:31 presents ungodly actions, which contradicts Romans 12:21's message to overcome evil with good.

Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 3:16-17

Daniel 11:31 describes defiling a temple, opposing the idea in 1 Corinthians that God's temple (believers) should remain holy and not defiled.

1 Corinthians 3:16-17: Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and [that] the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

Paradox #1

The verse in question speaks about the desecration of a holy place and the establishment of an idolatrous object. Some people find a potential contradiction due to the differing interpretations of what "the abomination of desolation" represents and its timing. Different religious traditions and scholars may have varying views on when and how this prophecy was or will be fulfilled, which can lead to conflicting interpretations within theological discussions.

Paradox #2

Some historians and scholars suggest that the events described may not perfectly align with historical records. The verse is often linked to the time of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, but some details in the prophecy might not match known historical events during his reign or later. This can lead to varying interpretations and debates among scholars.