Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
This verse emphasizes that man's plans are under God's direction, contrasting with Daniel 11:36 where it suggests a king will act according to his own will.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Contradiction with James 4:13-15
These verses speak to the unpredictability of life and reliance on God's will, contradicting Daniel 11:36 where the king acts and prospers according to his own desires.
James 4:13-15: Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain:
Contradiction with Isaiah 46:10
This verse highlights God's sovereign plan and purpose prevailing, contrasting with the apparent autonomy of the king in Daniel 11:36.
Isaiah 46:10: Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:
Contradiction with Psalm 33:10
This verse talks about the Lord bringing the counsel of nations to nothing, opposing Daniel 11:36 where a king's will seems to prosper without hindrance.
Psalm 33:10: The LORD bringeth the counsel of the heathen to nought: he maketh the devices of the people of none effect. [bringeth: Heb. maketh frustrate]
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
It states that many are the plans in a man's heart, but it's the Lord's purpose that prevails, contradicting the unilateral success of the king in Daniel 11:36.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Paradox #1
Theologically, some people might see a contradiction or inconsistency with Daniel 11:36 when comparing the portrayal of the king in this verse with other parts of the Bible where God's sovereignty and control over earthly rulers are emphasized. If the king is acting according to his own will without divine restraint, it might seem to conflict with the belief in God's ultimate authority over human actions. Some might also find inconsistency in interpreting who this king represents and whether this portrayal aligns with other descriptions of rulers or adversaries in biblical prophecy.
Paradox #2
The verse could be seen as having contradictions or conflicts because it is often interpreted as a prophecy with unclear references. Different interpretations across religious traditions and scholarly analyses lead to varied identifications of the "king" mentioned. This can cause inconsistencies when trying to match the description to a specific historical figure or event, as various rulers throughout history could potentially fit the prophecy. The ambiguity can lead to debates about its true fulfillment or meaning.
Paradox #3
Daniel 11:36 describes a king who will do as he pleases, exalting himself above every god and speaking against the God of gods. The potential contradiction or conflict here lies in the idea of a ruler acting with complete arrogance and self-exaltation, which might be seen as conflicting with the biblical teaching of humility and reverence for God. This king's behavior could be seen as contradictory to values of submission to divine authority and humility that are emphasized elsewhere in the Bible.