Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
This verse contradicts Daniel 1:8 because it states that what enters the mouth does not defile a person, whereas Daniel 1:8 implies that consuming the king's food would defile him.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
This verse contradicts Daniel 1:8 by declaring that nothing is unclean in itself, conflicting with Daniel's abstention from the king's food to avoid defilement.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
This verse contradicts Daniel 1:8 as it expresses that what God has cleansed should not be called common or unclean, opposing Daniel's view that the royal food would defile him.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Paradox #1
The moral conflict in Daniel 1:8 could be viewed as the tension between obeying earthly authority and following personal or religious convictions. Daniel chooses to follow his beliefs over the king’s orders, which can raise questions about when it's right to go against authority for personal or spiritual reasons.