Contradiction with Daniel 4:18
In Daniel 4:18, only Daniel is called to interpret the dream, contrary to Daniel 2:25 where he is brought to do so by Arioch, suggesting different levels of urgency or recognition of Daniel's skills.
Daniel 4:18: This dream I king Nebuchadnezzar have seen. Now thou, O Belteshazzar, declare the interpretation thereof, forasmuch as all the wise [men] of my kingdom are not able to make known unto me the interpretation: but thou [art] able; for the spirit of the holy gods [is] in thee.
Contradiction with Daniel 1:17
Daniel 1:17 indicates that God gives Daniel the ability to understand visions and dreams without needing the intervention of others as seen in Daniel 2:25 where Arioch introduces him.
Daniel 1:17: As for these four children, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom: and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams. [Daniel...: or, he made Daniel understand]
Contradiction with Matthew 2:12
In Matthew 2:12, divine guidance is given directly in a dream without needing interpretation, contrary to Daniel 2:25 where an interpreter is necessary.
Matthew 2:12: And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.
Contradiction with Genesis 40:8
In Genesis 40:8, Joseph attributes interpretation solely to God, unlike Daniel 2:25 where Daniel is actively brought in to interpret the king's dream.
Genesis 40:8: And they said unto him, We have dreamed a dream, and [there is] no interpreter of it. And Joseph said unto them, [Do] not interpretations [belong] to God? tell me [them], I pray you.
Contradiction with Acts 10:3-5
In Acts 10:3-5, Cornelius receives a vision directly and responds without needing someone like Daniel, unlike the scenario in Daniel 2:25.
Acts 10:3-5: He saw in a vision evidently about the ninth hour of the day an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius.