Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Daniel 2:34 depicts divine destruction initiated by a stone, whereas Isaiah 2:4 envisions a future without war, in which nation shall not lift up sword against nation.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Daniel 2:34 describes a violent divine intervention, contrasting with the Beatitudes’ blessing of peacemakers.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Daniel 2:34 involves a physical kingdom coming with destruction, while John 18:36 speaks of Jesus’ kingdom as not being of this world and not operating through worldly violence.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Contradiction with Luke 19:10
Daniel 2:34 involves a destructive act, whereas Luke 19:10 states Jesus’ mission was to seek and save the lost, aligning more with salvation than destruction.
Luke 19:10: For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
Contradiction with James 3:18
Daniel 2:34 reveals a kingdom established through destruction, in opposition to the concept of peace and righteousness sown by peacemakers in James 3:18.
James 3:18: And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.
Contradiction with Romans 14:17
Daniel 2:34 portrays physical destruction to establish a kingdom, while Romans 14:17 defines God's kingdom as righteousness, peace, and joy spiritually, not involving such violence.
Romans 14:17: For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.