Contradiction with Exodus 20:3
Daniel 3:29 promotes the worship and reverence of God; however, Exodus 20:3 explicitly states that no other gods should be worshipped.
Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Daniel 3:29 involves a decree that could result in severe punishment for those speaking ill against God, while Matthew 5:44 encourages loving and praying for one's enemies instead of retaliation.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 9:56
Daniel 3:29 endorses severe penalties for blasphemy against God, contrasting with Luke 9:56, where Jesus emphasizes saving lives rather than destroying them.
Luke 9:56: For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save [them]. And they went to another village.
Contradiction with James 1:20
Daniel 3:29 implies harsh, immediate judgment for blasphemy, whereas James 1:20 suggests that human wrath does not achieve righteous outcomes.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Daniel 3:29 prescribes punishment by human decree, but Romans 12:19 advises leaving vengeance to God rather than taking personal or legal retribution.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
Daniel 3:29 could present a theological inconsistency in that it seems to endorse the idea of forcing people to respect a particular religion under threat of punishment. This might appear to conflict with the broader biblical message about the importance of free will in choosing to believe and the more general teaching of love and compassion for one's neighbor.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction could be about the use of force or punishment in promoting religious belief. In Daniel 3:29, a decree is made that threatens severe consequences for speaking against a specific God. This can conflict with the broader biblical principle of free will and voluntary faith, where belief is a personal choice rather than compelled by threats or violence.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be the idea of using threats of violence or punishment to force people to respect a religion or belief system. It suggests supporting religious tolerance through coercion, which contradicts the notion of genuine, voluntary respect and freedom of belief.