Contradiction with Matthew 7:19
While Daniel 4:12 speaks of a tree providing sustenance and shelter, Matthew 7:19 talks about cutting down trees that do not produce good fruit, implying destruction rather than provision.
Matthew 7:19: Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.
Contradiction with Mark 11:14
In contrast to Daniel 4:12 where the tree is flourishing, Mark 11:14 describes Jesus cursing a fig tree for not bearing fruit, leading it to wither, which suggests an end rather than continuance of life.
Mark 11:14: And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard [it].
Contradiction with Luke 13:7
Unlike the fruitful and life-giving tree in Daniel 4:12, Luke 13:7 features a barren fig tree that is intended to be cut down, highlighting unproductiveness and removal rather than abundance.
Luke 13:7: Then said he unto the dresser of his vineyard, Behold, these three years I come seeking fruit on this fig tree, and find none: cut it down; why cumbereth it the ground?
Contradiction with Jeremiah 8:13
Daniel 4:12 describes a productive tree, but Jeremiah 8:13 speaks of God removing fruitfulness from the vines and trees, indicating a loss and desolation.
Jeremiah 8:13: I will surely consume them, saith the LORD: [there shall be] no grapes on the vine, nor figs on the fig tree, and the leaf shall fade; and [the things that] I have given them shall pass away from them.
Contradiction with Isaiah 34:4
This verse presents a vision of the heavens and their host dissolving and falling, unlike the stable and nourishing tree in Daniel 4:12, indicating upheaval and destruction rather than stability and nurturing.
Isaiah 34:4: And all the host of heaven shall be dissolved, and the heavens shall be rolled together as a scroll: and all their host shall fall down, as the leaf falleth off from the vine, and as a falling [fig] from the fig tree.