Contradictions and Paradoxes in Daniel 4:32

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Daniel 4:32 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Daniel 4:32. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Daniel, God wanted to teach a proud king that He is the one who decides who should be in charge. So, the king would have to live like an animal and eat grass until he understood that God was in control.

Daniel 4:32: And they shall drive thee from men, and thy dwelling [shall be] with the beasts of the field: they shall make thee to eat grass as oxen, and seven times shall pass over thee, until thou know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.

Contradiction with Proverbs 8:15

This verse states that kings reign by the wisdom of God, suggesting rulers are established by divine wisdom, not by being removed from power as implied in Daniel 4:32.

Proverbs 8:15: By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.

Contradiction with Romans 13:1

This verse emphasizes that all authority comes from God and that existing authorities are established by God, contrasting the temporary removal of Nebuchadnezzar’s authority in Daniel 4:32.

Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]

Contradiction with Colossians 1:16

It states that all things were created through and for Christ, implying a divine order that doesn't align with a king being made to live among beasts as in Daniel 4:32.

Colossians 1:16: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 20:6

This verse recognizes God's rule over all the kingdoms, suggesting a continual divine leadership contrary to the withdrawal of kingship seen in Daniel 4:32.

2 Chronicles 20:6: And said, O LORD God of our fathers, [art] not thou God in heaven? and rulest [not] thou over all the kingdoms of the heathen? and in thine hand [is there not] power and might, so that none is able to withstand thee?

Contradiction with Isaiah 9:6-7

It speaks of an everlasting kingdom of peace ruled by the Messiah, contrasting the temporal removal and restoration of kingship in Daniel 4:32.

Isaiah 9:6-7: For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Contradiction with Psalm 8:5-6

This passage describes man's dominion and honor above animals, conflicting with Nebuchadnezzar's exile to live like a beast in Daniel 4:32.

Psalm 8:5-6: For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.

Contradiction with Psalm 22:28

It declares that God is the governor among the nations, suggesting ongoing leadership that contrasts with the removal of Nebuchadnezzar’s rule.

Psalm 22:28: For the kingdom [is] the LORD'S: and he [is] the governor among the nations.

Paradox #1

The potential contradiction in Daniel 4:32 could involve the concept of divine sovereignty versus human free will. This verse emphasizes God's control over kingdoms, which might raise questions about how human decisions and free will align with God's overarching authority. If God truly controls all aspects of authority and power, it could seem like human choices are predetermined, leading to debates on the balance between divine intervention and human responsibility.

Paradox #2

The contradiction or conflict in Daniel 4:32 might arise from the idea of divine sovereignty and human free will. The verse emphasizes God's ultimate control over kingdoms and the fate of people, which can seem at odds with the belief that humans have the freedom to make their own choices. Balancing the concept of an all-powerful deity deciding outcomes with the notion of free will can be confusing or problematic for some.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.