Contradiction with Romans 13:1
This verse emphasizes submission to governing authorities, whereas Daniel 6:10 depicts Daniel defying the king's decree by praying to God.
Romans 13:1: Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. [ordained: or, ordered]
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:21
Advises fearing the Lord and the king, implying respect for both divine and earthly authority, which could clash with Daniel's choice to defy the king's law.
Proverbs 24:21: My son, fear thou the LORD and the king: [and] meddle not with them that are given to change: [them...: Heb. changers]
Contradiction with Titus 3:1
Encourages obedience to rulers and authorities, potentially contrasting with Daniel refusing the king’s decree.
Titus 3:1: Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 8:2
Advises keeping the king's commandment, which Daniel does not do in 6:10 when he chooses to pray despite the ban.
Ecclesiastes 8:2: I [counsel thee] to keep the king's commandment, and [that] in regard of the oath of God.
Paradox #1
Daniel 6:10 talks about Daniel continuing to pray to his God despite a law being passed that forbids it. The moral conflict here lies between obeying the law of the land and staying true to one's faith and religious practices. Daniel chooses his faith over the law, which raises questions about loyalty and the consequences of choosing religious conviction over legal obedience.