Contradiction with Numbers 18:20
This verse states that the Levites, including Aaron, shall have no inheritance in the land, which aligns with Deuteronomy 10:9 rather than contradicts it.
Numbers 18:20: And the LORD spake unto Aaron, Thou shalt have no inheritance in their land, neither shalt thou have any part among them: I [am] thy part and thine inheritance among the children of Israel.
Contradiction with Joshua 14:3-4
These verses mention that the Levites did not have a portion in the land but received cities to dwell in, which complements rather than contradicts the inheritance laws described in Deuteronomy 10:9.
Joshua 14:3-4: For Moses had given the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe on the other side Jordan: but unto the Levites he gave none inheritance among them.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 44:28
Similar to Deuteronomy 10:9, this verse confirms that the LORD is the inheritance of the Levites, not land or material possessions.
Ezekiel 44:28: And it shall be unto them for an inheritance: I [am] their inheritance: and ye shall give them no possession in Israel: I [am] their possession.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Deuteronomy 10:9 could involve the idea of inheritance. The verse mentions that the tribe of Levi does not have a traditional inheritance like the other tribes, as their inheritance is serving the Lord. This situation might appear inconsistent with other passages that discuss the distribution of land and blessings to all tribes of Israel as part of God's promise to His people. This could lead to questions about fairness or how God provides differently for different groups within His chosen people.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 10:9 suggests that the tribe of Levi did not receive a portion of land as inheritance because their role was to serve religious functions. A potential contradiction might arise because other parts of the Bible, like Joshua 21, mention the Levites receiving certain cities and pasture lands. This could create confusion about whether or not they received a territorial inheritance like other tribes.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in this verse could arise from the idea of fairness and equality in distribution. While the verse describes a distinct privilege given to a particular group, it might be seen as inconsistent with the concept of equal treatment or distribution of resources among all groups. This could create a perceived conflict for those who believe that resources and opportunities should be equally available to everyone.