Contradiction with Leviticus 17:3-4
These verses require all Israelites to bring their slaughtered animals to the entrance of the Tabernacle, contradicting the permission in Deuteronomy 12:21 to slaughter animals wherever they are living.
Leviticus 17:3-4: What man soever [there be] of the house of Israel, that killeth an ox, or lamb, or goat, in the camp, or that killeth [it] out of the camp,
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:15
This verse allows the eating of meat within towns without distinction of holiness or ceremonial status, whereas Deuteronomy 12:21 ties permission to distance from the sanctuary.
Deuteronomy 12:15: Notwithstanding thou mayest kill and eat flesh in all thy gates, whatsoever thy soul lusteth after, according to the blessing of the LORD thy God which he hath given thee: the unclean and the clean may eat thereof, as of the roebuck, and as of the hart.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:27
Specifies that burnt offerings must be offered at the altar along with the blood, contradicting the allowance of personal slaughtering and consumption in lieu of offering.
Deuteronomy 12:27: And thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, the flesh and the blood, upon the altar of the LORD thy God: and the blood of thy sacrifices shall be poured out upon the altar of the LORD thy God, and thou shalt eat the flesh.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 14:32-34
Illustrates a scenario where Israelites eat meat with blood, which is directly counter to the instructions in Deuteronomy regarding proper slaughter and preparation.
1 Samuel 14:32-34: And the people flew upon the spoil, and took sheep, and oxen, and calves, and slew [them] on the ground: and the people did eat [them] with the blood.
Contradiction with 1 Kings 8:63
Documents Solomon offering sacrifices in mass quantities at the Temple, which emphasizes centralized sacrificial worship contrary to the more decentralized allowance in Deuteronomy 12:21.
1 Kings 8:63: And Solomon offered a sacrifice of peace offerings, which he offered unto the LORD, two and twenty thousand oxen, and an hundred and twenty thousand sheep. So the king and all the children of Israel dedicated the house of the LORD.
Paradox #1
The possible theological inconsistency in Deuteronomy 12:21 could involve the instruction about where and how to slaughter animals for food, which might conflict with earlier laws that focused exclusively on sacrifices made at the tabernacle or temple. This could seem inconsistent with the centralized worship practices that are emphasized elsewhere.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:21 could be related to the laws about where sacrifices are to be made. Earlier parts of the Bible specify that sacrifices should only occur at the Tabernacle or designated holy places. Deuteronomy 12:21, however, permits people to slaughter and eat meat in their own towns if they cannot easily reach the holy site. This could seem inconsistent with the centralization of worship and sacrifice in a single place.
Paradox #3
The Bible verse may have contradictions or inconsistencies with earlier parts of the text regarding where sacrifices should be made. Initially, it is instructed to make sacrifices only at designated places, like the tabernacle or temple. However, this verse seems to allow exceptions if someone lives far away, which could conflict with the earlier restrictions, leading to different interpretations or practices.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse might arise from the idea of killing animals for food, which could conflict with values of non-violence and compassion. Some people may see a tension between religious practices that allow for animal sacrifice and more modern ethical concerns about animal rights and welfare.