Contradiction with Genesis 9:3
Deuteronomy 12:25 advises not eating blood, while Genesis 9:3 suggests that every moving thing can be food, broadening dietary permissions.
Genesis 9:3: Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, implying all elements of food consumption, whereas Deuteronomy 12:25 restricts eating blood.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
Peter is told in a vision to not call impure what God has made clean, seemingly lifting dietary restrictions that include prohibitions like Deuteronomy 12:25.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
States that nothing is unclean in itself, which contradicts the implications of impurity in consuming blood as stated in Deuteronomy 12:25.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 10:25
Advises eating anything sold in the meat market without raising questions of conscience, in contrast to the directive of avoiding blood in Deuteronomy 12:25.
1 Corinthians 10:25: Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, [that] eat, asking no question for conscience sake:
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:25 could be related to the dietary restrictions in the Old Testament, specifically the prohibition of eating blood. In the New Testament, particularly in Mark 7:18-19, Jesus declares all foods clean, which can seem inconsistent with the earlier Old Testament laws. This may create a conflict for some interpretations regarding whether these dietary laws remain applicable to Christians.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction involves the dietary laws. Deuteronomy 12:25 tells people not to eat blood, but some other cultures and later traditions had different practices or interpretations about consuming blood. This could create inconsistencies with different customs or potentially with later biblical texts that don't emphasize this rule as strongly.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Deuteronomy 12:25 might stem from the Old Testament's numerous dietary laws and restrictions, which some people find conflicting when compared to the freedom from such laws as taught in the New Testament. The Old Testament has specific rules, while the New Testament emphasizes different principles, leading to potential conflicts in how one should live according to the Bible.