Contradiction with Leviticus 11:13-19
Lists similar creatures that are abominable and should not be eaten, yet includes exceptions not mentioned in Deuteronomy 14:18.
Leviticus 11:13-19: And these [are they which] ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they [are] an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray,
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
God instructs Peter to eat all kinds of animals, declaring them clean, which contradicts the dietary restriction in Deuteronomy 14:18.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares that nothing entering a person from outside can defile them, which contradicts the dietary laws outlined in Deuteronomy 14:18.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states that no food is unclean in itself, differing from the specific prohibitions in Deuteronomy 14:18.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
Asserts that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused if received with thanksgiving, which contrasts with the dietary restrictions in Deuteronomy 14:18.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Paradox #1
The scientific inconsistency in this verse is that it categorizes bats as birds. In scientific terms, bats are mammals, not birds, because they give birth to live young and produce milk. This classification contradicts the biological definition used in modern science.