Contradiction with Matthew 26:11
While Deuteronomy 15:4 suggests there should be no poor among the Israelites, Matthew 26:11 acknowledges the perpetual existence of the poor.
Matthew 26:11: For ye have the poor always with you; but me ye have not always.
Contradiction with John 12:8
This verse states that the poor will always be present, conflicting with the notion in Deuteronomy 15:4 of a time when there would be no poor among the people.
John 12:8: For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
Contradiction with Mark 14:7
Similar to John 12:8, this verse indicates a continual presence of the poor, which contradicts Deuteronomy 15:4’s ideal of eliminating poverty.
Mark 14:7: For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 15:4 mentions that there should be no poor among the people because God will bless them in the land. However, this can seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that acknowledge the existence of the poor and encourage helping them, like in Matthew 26:11 where Jesus says, "You will always have the poor among you." This might appear contradictory because one verse suggests there will be no poverty while another acknowledges its continued existence.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 15:4 might seem to contradict other parts of the Bible that talk about the existence of poverty or the ongoing presence of need among people. For example, verses that acknowledge the poor will always be present could seem inconsistent with any implication that poverty could be fully eliminated. Therefore, this can look like a contradiction because one part suggests an ideal state without poverty, while other parts acknowledge it as a continual reality.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in Deuteronomy 15:4 is that it suggests there should be no poverty among the Israelites if they follow God's commandments. However, other parts of the Bible, like in the New Testament, acknowledge the continuing presence of the poor. This raises questions about the practical reality versus the ideal state described in the verse.
Paradox #4
The verse suggests a situation of no poverty in society, but in reality, economic conditions fluctuate due to various factors. Achieving a society without any poverty may not align with observable economic and social dynamics.
Paradox #5
Deuteronomy 15:4 could be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency because it talks about eliminating poverty, yet in reality, poverty has continued to exist throughout history, even among communities who follow biblical teachings. This might raise questions about the practicality or application of this ideal in the real world.