Contradiction with Leviticus 17:3-4
These verses state that sacrifices must be brought to the tabernacle and offered in the presence of the Lord, whereas Deuteronomy 16:2 allows sacrifices in the place the Lord chooses, suggesting a broader application beyond the tabernacle.
Leviticus 17:3-4: What man soever [there be] of the house of Israel, that killeth an ox, or lamb, or goat, in the camp, or that killeth [it] out of the camp,
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 12:21
This verse allows for the slaughter of animals outside the designated place if it is too far, whereas Deuteronomy 16:2 emphasizes offering sacrifices specifically at the centralized location chosen by God.
Deuteronomy 12:21: If the place which the LORD thy God hath chosen to put his name there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock, which the LORD hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy gates whatsoever thy soul lusteth after.
Contradiction with 2 Chronicles 7:12
This verse indicates God choosing the temple in Jerusalem as the place for sacrifices permanently, while Deuteronomy 16:2 implies a more flexible location wherever God chooses.
2 Chronicles 7:12: And the LORD appeared to Solomon by night, and said unto him, I have heard thy prayer, and have chosen this place to myself for an house of sacrifice.
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 16:2 might raise questions about the location where sacrifices should be made, as it specifies a centralized place chosen by God. This could conflict with earlier practices where sacrifices were made at various local altars.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 16:2 talks about sacrificing animals in a designated place. A potential conflict is that earlier texts, like in Exodus, allow for sacrifices in multiple locations. This could create confusion about the correct practice for sacrifices.