Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 17:6 by suggesting mercy and forgiveness, as it emphasizes not casting the first stone unless without sin.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 17:6 by advocating against using violence, indicating those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 17:6 by teaching to turn the other cheek, promoting non-retaliation and forgiveness rather than execution.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Deuteronomy 17:6 might arise when comparing it to other biblical passages that emphasize forgiveness and mercy, such as those in the New Testament. In Deuteronomy 17:6, the requirement for witnesses and the consequence for wrongdoing may seem harsh in light of Jesus' teachings on grace and forgiveness. This might create a perceived inconsistency between justice and mercy within the broader biblical narrative.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 17:6 requires the testimony of two or three witnesses before someone can be put to death. A potential doctrinal conflict could arise when compared to John 8:7, where Jesus suggests that anyone without sin can cast the first stone, emphasizing mercy over strict adherence to the law. This could be seen as a tension between justice and mercy.
Paradox #3
Deuteronomy 17:6 talks about the requirement of having two or three witnesses to convict someone of a crime deserving death. The contradiction or conflict here could be related to other parts of the Bible where this rule might not seem to be followed consistently. For example, in some stories or laws, decisions or punishments appear to be made without this specific requirement of multiple witnesses, leading to potential inconsistencies in how justice is portrayed or carried out.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict with this verse could be related to the concept of justice and the value of human life. It suggests that a person can be sentenced to death only on the testimony of two or three witnesses, which raises concerns about the reliability of witnesses and the potential for wrongful convictions. This could contradict the moral principle that life should be protected and that justice should be served fairly and accurately.
Paradox #5
Deuteronomy 17:6 suggests that a person can only be put to death based on the testimony of two or three witnesses. A contradiction could arise when comparing this with other verses that might specify a different number of witnesses or a different requirement for establishing guilt. In some other contexts or legal systems, only one witness might be needed, or a completely different standard might apply, leading to inconsistencies in the requirements for legal proceedings.