Contradiction with Proverbs 22:28
This verse supports rather than contradicts Deuteronomy 19:14 by advising not to remove the ancient landmark set by forefathers, similar to the command in Deuteronomy.
Proverbs 22:28: Remove not the ancient landmark, which thy fathers have set. [landmark: or, bound]
Contradiction with Proverbs 23:10
This verse also aligns with Deuteronomy 19:14, reinforcing the prohibition against removing landmarks.
Proverbs 23:10: Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherless: [landmark: or, bound]
Contradiction with Micah 2:2
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 19:14 by depicting acts of taking fields and houses by violence, which involves disregarding property boundaries.
Micah 2:2: And they covet fields, and take [them] by violence; and houses, and take [them] away: so they oppress a man and his house, even a man and his heritage. [oppress: or, defraud]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 22:26
This does not strictly contradict the verse but addresses neglect in observing laws, including property boundaries, which can metaphorically highlight neglect of commandments like the one in Deuteronomy 19:14.
Ezekiel 22:26: Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed [difference] between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them. [violated: Heb. offered violence to]
Paradox #1
The potential conflict with Deuteronomy 19:14 may arise when considering the broader biblical themes of justice and equity. The verse emphasizes maintaining boundary markers set up by ancestors, which could be seen as supporting inherited inequality or lack of land redistribution. This might conflict with other biblical principles that focus on justice, fairness, and support for marginalized groups, prompting discussions about how these values are balanced or prioritized.