Contradiction with Matthew 18:16
This verse reinforces the principle in Deuteronomy 19:15 rather than contradicts it.
Matthew 18:16: But if he will not hear [thee, then] take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 5:19
This verse aligns with Deuteronomy 19:15 by also emphasizing the necessity of multiple witnesses.
1 Timothy 5:19: Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. [before: or, under]
Paradox #1
Deuteronomy 19:15 could be seen as having a doctrinal conflict with situations in the Bible where a single witness is considered valid or important, such as in some of the accounts of Jesus' resurrection, where a single individual's testimony is highlighted. This can create an inconsistency regarding the number of witnesses needed for a testimony to be accepted.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency with this verse could relate to differing accounts or practices regarding legal witnesses and testimonies in other parts of the Bible. For example, there might be differences in how many witnesses are needed or how evidence is presented in other biblical contexts or laws, creating a contrast with what is mentioned in this verse.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this context could lie in the emphasis on multiple witnesses for establishing truth, which may conflict with instances where a single testimony is significant or relied upon, such as in situations where no other witnesses are present. Balancing the need for fairness and the necessity to believe individuals can create tension.