Contradiction with Proverbs 19:5
This verse states that a false witness shall not be unpunished, while Deuteronomy 19:16 deals with establishing a matter through witnesses without immediate mention of consequence.
Proverbs 19:5: A false witness shall not be unpunished, and [he that] speaketh lies shall not escape. [unpunished: Heb. held innocent]
Contradiction with Exodus 20:16
This verse commands not to bear false witness, implying it should not occur, in contrast to Deuteronomy 19:16 which addresses the reality of false witness being present.
Exodus 20:16: Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Contradiction with Proverbs 6:19
This verse lists a false witness as one of the things the Lord hates, contrasting with Deuteronomy 19:16 by focusing on God's disdain rather than legal procedures.
Proverbs 6:19: A false witness [that] speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.
Contradiction with Proverbs 12:22
This scripture states that lying lips are an abomination, contradicting Deuteronomy 19:16 by emphasizing moral wrongness rather than procedural justice.
Proverbs 12:22: Lying lips [are] abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly [are] his delight.
Contradiction with Matthew 19:18
Jesus reiterates the commandment against bearing false witness, in contrast to Deuteronomy 19:16's treatment as an issue of juridical process rather than moral instruction.
Matthew 19:18: He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
Paradox #1
The verse talks about a false witness, and one potential conflict could be with the idea of forgiveness. In some parts of the Bible, forgiveness and turning the other cheek are emphasized. However, the consequences for being a false witness in this verse might seem harsh compared to the emphasis on forgiveness elsewhere, which could be seen as inconsistent.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in this verse could be that while it emphasizes justice by condemning false witnesses, it may raise questions about the implementation of fairness. Some might argue whether the punishment for false witnessing is always justly executed or if it could be misused, leading to further injustice.