Contradiction with Exodus 21:12
This verse states that anyone who smites a man so that he dies shall be surely put to death, which contradicts Deuteronomy 19:4's allowance for accidental deaths without intention.
Exodus 21:12: He that smiteth a man, so that he die, shall be surely put to death.
Contradiction with Numbers 35:16
This verse prescribes death as a punishment for someone who kills another with an iron weapon, contradicting the allowance for unintended killings as per Deuteronomy 19:4.
Numbers 35:16: And if he smite him with an instrument of iron, so that he die, he [is] a murderer: the murderer shall surely be put to death.
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:17
This verse states that whoever kills any man shall surely be put to death, which contrasts with Deuteronomy 19:4's provision for accidental killings without intent or hatred.
Leviticus 24:17: And he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death. [killeth...: Heb. smiteth the life of a man]
Contradiction with Exodus 21:14
This verse states that if a man acts presumptuously and kills another with guile, he must be taken from God's altar to die, suggesting no sanctuary for killers, which differs from Deuteronomy 19:4's perspective on cities of refuge for accidental deaths.
Exodus 21:14: But if a man come presumptuously upon his neighbour, to slay him with guile; thou shalt take him from mine altar, that he may die.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Deuteronomy 19:4 could arise from how societies define and interpret concepts like justice and intent. The verse discusses providing refuge to someone who has accidentally caused harm, highlighting the idea of mercy and protection for unintentional actions. This can conflict with contemporary views on accountability where even accidental actions may carry consequences. Balancing mercy and justice can present moral challenges in how different cultures and legal systems view responsibility for accidents.