Contradiction with Numbers 13:31
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 1:21 by showing that the spies discouraged the people from taking the land, claiming they were not able to go up against the people because they were stronger.
Numbers 13:31: But the men that went up with him said, We be not able to go up against the people; for they [are] stronger than we.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 1:26
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 1:21 by showing that the Israelites refused to go up and possess the land, rebelling against the command of the Lord.
Deuteronomy 1:26: Notwithstanding ye would not go up, but rebelled against the commandment of the LORD your God:
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 1:28
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 1:21 because it reflects the people's fear and doubt regarding the strength and stature of the inhabitants of the land, leading to their hesitation.
Deuteronomy 1:28: Whither shall we go up? our brethren have discouraged our heart, saying, The people [is] greater and taller than we; the cities [are] great and walled up to heaven; and moreover we have seen the sons of the Anakims there. [discouraged: Heb. melted]
Contradiction with Numbers 14:4
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 1:21 by illustrating the Israelites' desire to appoint a leader and return to Egypt instead of possessing the land as commanded.
Numbers 14:4: And they said one to another, Let us make a captain, and let us return into Egypt.
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 9:23
This verse contradicts Deuteronomy 1:21 as it recounts the Israelites' rebellion and disbelief, refusing to trust and possess the land despite being told to do so by God.
Deuteronomy 9:23: Likewise when the LORD sent you from Kadeshbarnea, saying, Go up and possess the land which I have given you; then ye rebelled against the commandment of the LORD your God, and ye believed him not, nor hearkened to his voice.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Deuteronomy 1:21 could be related to the theme of God commanding people to take possession of a land that is already inhabited by others. This raises questions about the morality of displacing others from their homes and lands, conflicting with modern perspectives on rights and justice.