Contradiction with Acts 10:34
Deuteronomy 1:5 implies Moses was chosen uniquely to deliver God's law, while Acts 10:34 states that God does not show favoritism and suggests that no person is more chosen than another.
Acts 10:34: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Romans 2:11
Deuteronomy 1:5 involves Moses as a mediator between God and Israelites, but Romans 2:11 states that God does not have respect of persons, contradicting the notion of partiality.
Romans 2:11: For there is no respect of persons with God.
Contradiction with John 1:17
Deuteronomy 1:5 focuses on the law given through Moses, while John 1:17 emphasizes that grace and truth came through Jesus Christ, suggesting a shift or contrast from Mosaic law.
John 1:17: For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
Deuteronomy 1:5 refers to the commands given by Moses, but Hebrews 8:13 speaks of a new covenant, making the first obsolete, contrasting with the permanence implied in Deuteronomy.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Deuteronomy 1:5 presents the law as a guide, whereas Galatians 3:24-25 indicates the law was only a tutor until Christ came, who marks an end to that tutorship.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.