Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Deuteronomy 20:11 suggests making people tributaries upon surrender, whereas Matthew 5:44 teaches to love your enemies and bless them.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Deuteronomy 20:11 involves subjugation, but Luke 6:27 instructs to do good to those who hate you.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
Deuteronomy 20:11 implies seeking advantage, yet Romans 12:17 advises against repaying evil for evil and recommends honorable conduct.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21
Deuteronomy 20:11 involves extracting tribute, while Proverbs 25:21 encourages giving food and drink to an enemy in need.
Proverbs 25:21: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Deuteronomy 20:11 is the ethical issue of conquering cities and forcing people into servitude, which can conflict with later biblical teachings on love, mercy, and treating others with dignity and respect. This can appear inconsistent with messages found in the New Testament, where more emphasis is placed on love and forgiveness.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 20:11 discusses offering peace to a city during wartime, where the city's acceptance leads to forced labor. This could be seen as contradictory to verses that promote universal compassion or freedom, as it implies subjugation rather than liberation or equality.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be seen as the tension between promoting peace and offering surrender, while at the same time allowing for the subjugation of people. On one hand, it suggests a peaceful resolution, but on the other, it involves making people serve, which raises questions about freedom and fairness.