Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse instructs to love enemies, contradicting Deuteronomy 21:12's context of taking captives.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse's commandment "Thou shalt not kill" contrasts with the context of warfare and captivity handling in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse states equality in Christ, contradicting the notion of possessing captives implied in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
This verse advises against repaying evil for evil, contrasting with the treatment of captives in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with Luke 6:31
This "Golden Rule" verse suggests treating others as desired for oneself, opposing the implied treatment of captives in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Luke 6:31: And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 22:3
This verse calls for justice and right treatment towards strangers, opposite to the capture and treatment context in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Jeremiah 22:3: Thus saith the LORD; Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:14
This verse promotes love and unity, contrasting the permissiveness of keeping captives in Deuteronomy 21:12.
Colossians 3:14: And above all these things [put on] charity, which is the bond of perfectness.
Paradox #1
This verse describes a ritual for a captive woman before she becomes a wife, which can be seen as conflicting with teachings about love, consent, and the dignity of individuals. It suggests treating people as property, which contradicts later biblical messages about love and respect for others.
Paradox #2
Deuteronomy 21:12 could be seen as potentially conflicting with teachings about compassion and treating others with dignity. This verse involves a practice that might not align with modern ideas about consent and individual rights, leading to discussions about ethical treatment and the evolution of moral understandings.
Paradox #3
This verse might be seen as morally problematic because it discusses a situation where a woman, captured in war, is taken as a wife. This can conflict with modern values around consent and the dignity of individuals, highlighting a contradiction between ancient practices and contemporary moral standards regarding personal autonomy and human rights.